Amit Langote
amitl****@gmail*****
2013年 10月 29日 (火) 16:33:17 JST
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Beena Emerson <memis****@gmail*****> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Amit Langote <amitl****@gmail*****> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Beena Emerson <memis****@gmail*****> >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Amit Langote <amitl****@gmail*****> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Beena Emerson >> >> <memis****@gmail*****> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > Please find attached the patch which removes the mention of C locale >> >> > restriction from the pg_bigm documents and also edits the English >> >> > release >> >> > note point. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Should the "Available database encoding and locale" row in the table >> >> be kept with pg_bigm column also saying - "Same as PostgreSQL" >> >> >> > >> > The table lists out the differences. So I removed it. >> > >> >> Ah, okay. I guess the point that locale is no more restricted to C is >> still highlighted elsewhere, right? > > > Only in the release note. Nowhere in the pg_bigm document. > Could there be a line somewhere saying "pg_bigm uses the locale and encoding of the current database"? I think that is the case. What do you think? -- Amit
Fork