Le 21/01/2019 à 09:04, Mike Rapoport a écrit : > Add check for the return value of memblock_alloc*() functions and call > panic() in case of error. > The panic message repeats the one used by panicing memblock allocators with > adjustment of parameters to include only relevant ones. > > The replacement was mostly automated with semantic patches like the one > below with manual massaging of format strings. > > @@ > expression ptr, size, align; > @@ > ptr = memblock_alloc(size, align); > + if (!ptr) > + panic("%s: Failed to allocate %lu bytes align=0x%lx\n", __func__, > size, align); > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt****@linux*****> > Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo****@c-sky*****> # c-sky > Acked-by: Paul Burton <paul.****@mips*****> # MIPS > Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko****@de*****> # s390 > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgros****@suse*****> # Xen > --- [...] > diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c > index 7ea5dc6..ad94242 100644 > --- a/mm/sparse.c > +++ b/mm/sparse.c [...] > @@ -425,6 +436,10 @@ static void __init sparse_buffer_init(unsigned long size, int nid) > memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(size, PAGE_SIZE, > __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS), > MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid); > + if (!sparsemap_buf) > + panic("%s: Failed to allocate %lu bytes align=0x%lx nid=%d from=%lx\n", > + __func__, size, PAGE_SIZE, nid, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS)); > + memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() does not panic (help explicitly says: Does not zero allocated memory, does not panic if request cannot be satisfied.). Stephen Rothwell reports a boot failure due to this change. Christophe > sparsemap_buf_end = sparsemap_buf + size; > } > >