Ticket #9055

Group Permissions - Missing "hierarchy"
Date d'ouverture: 2006-09-25 09:50 Dernière mise à jour: 2006-11-09 18:40

Rapporteur:
Propriétaire:
(Aucun)
État:
Ouvert
Composant:
(Aucun)
Jalon:
(Aucun)
Priorité:
5 - moyen
Sévérité:
5 - moyen
Résolution:
Accepted
Fichier:
Aucun

Détails


When create a group of users "Moderators"
and give the group permission to administrate
"User Module"
- it should respect the system of user ranking
where each user/group (except admin id 1)
is subordinate to a single other element.

/!\

"Moderators" should be allowed to manage,
for example, simple "registered members" but
not "webmasters"

Ticket History (3/7 Histories)

2006-09-25 09:58 Updated by: gigamaster
  • Summary Updated
  • Priorité Update from 5 - moyen to 9 - le plus élevé
Commentaire
Logged In: YES
user_id=23046

After removing "special rank" of group "moderators"
it still not considering the "Level" of user ranking system.
Group members can edit an "admin" level 5 account!!!
2006-09-25 14:04 Updated by: minahito
  • Summary Updated
  • Propriétaire Update from (Aucun) to minahito
  • Résolution Update from Aucun to Accepted
Commentaire
Logged In: YES
user_id=8353

Yes, this is an important problem. We may have to develop
optional permissions. Alpha5 will check who administrator
is, with $mid. Then, we'll consider whether the controller
should introduce optional permissions.
2006-09-27 17:44 Updated by: minahito
  • Summary Updated
  • Priorité Update from 9 - le plus élevé to 7
Commentaire
Logged In: YES
user_id=8353

Legacy based on XOOPS2 can't introduce new permission
management concept. So I'll try to develop such concept with
the adapter to XCube role base permission management, in Beta.
2006-10-14 18:12 Updated by: minahito
  • Summary Updated
Commentaire
Logged In: YES
user_id=8353

Umm...

I've considered this spec. But, it's too difficult. The user
rank is simple title for enjoying community. That's not
strict value for the expression of hierarchy. It's difficult
that Legacy implements this feature for all. I think that
such management features should be implemented by additional
modules.
2006-11-08 15:33 Updated by: minahito
  • Summary Updated
  • Propriétaire Update from minahito to (Aucun)
2006-11-08 17:22 Updated by: minahito
  • Summary Updated
  • Priorité Update from 7 to 1 - le plus bas
  • (Catégorie change on Tracker)
Commentaire
Logged In: YES
user_id=8353

Adjusted the priority of this item for RC.
2006-11-09 18:40 Updated by: minahito
  • Summary Updated
  • Priorité Update from 1 - le plus bas to 5 - moyen
  • (Groupe change on Tracker)
  • (Catégorie change on Tracker)
Commentaire
Logged In: YES
user_id=8353

I think ... this is special user module. And, we can
exchange the default user module with such use module.

MOVE to FEATURE REQUEST.

Attachment File List

No attachments

Modifier

You are not logged in. I you are not logged in, your comment will be treated as an anonymous post. » Connexion