Did you mean this to be included in 3.1? Target MileStone has not been set at all, and it's getting late to take more stuff in to S3_1 d3f plans.
Reply To cazfi
Did you mean this to be included in 3.1? Target MileStone has not been set at all, and it's getting late to take more stuff in to S3_1 d3f plans.
I think it can wait. Setting to 3.2 for now.
Reply To kvilhaugsvik
This isn't straight forward. "Pillage" involves an activity. One option is to create a new "Pillage 2" unit activity.
Don't think reworking activities is coming to S3_2 any more.
Reply To cazfi
Reply To kvilhaugsvik
This isn't straight forward. "Pillage" involves an activity. One option is to create a new "Pillage 2" unit activity.
Don't think reworking activities is coming to S3_2 any more.
#48685 provides a better way. Let's build this on top of that.
A ruleset author may want enabler and casus belli rules to apply to the tile owner in most cases but to the extras owner in some cases. A fake generalized "Pillage" would allow one be tile targeted and the other extras targeted and only enabled with an owned extra at the target tile.
This isn't straight forward. "Pillage" involves an activity. One option is to create a new "Pillage 2" unit activity. The road I hope to take is to brush the dust of my old activity-has-action-patches now that they have a potential user in fake generalized "Pillage".